The crucial aspect of being able to find the Best NowNodes Pay Alternatives for developers who wish to have more flexibility and/or enhanced performance and cost-effective blockchain infrastructure is the ability to find diverse options that have recently become available.
In 2026, projects have the ability to select providers with a large support of blockchain, faster RPC endpoints, and decentralized access models with developer tools.
This guide provides the best alternatives that offer dependable node, powerful APIs, and customizable scalable solutions for the modern Web3.
What is NowNodes?
NowNodes is a blockchain-as-a-service platform offering full-node and explorer access. Clients include developers, projects, and businesses.
Hosts no infrastructure; instead, access endpoints, WebSockets, and explorer data for 100+ blockchains at high availability and low latency. Clients easily build wallets, dApps, exchanges, analytics, and other Web3 apps.
Key Point
| Platform | Key Strength |
|---|---|
| Alchemy | Enterprise-grade Web3 API and developer tools |
| Blast | Cost-efficient, high-throughput RPC infrastructure |
| Dexter Lab | Institutional-level blockchain infrastructure |
| Syndica | Solana-optimized RPC with advanced analytics |
| Ankr | Decentralized multi-chain RPC network |
| QuickNode | High-performance global blockchain infrastructure |
| GenesysGO | Solana RPC and validator infrastructure |
| OMNIA | Decentralized RPC with censorship resistance |
| BetaRPC | Simple, lightweight RPC endpoints |
| Infura | Trusted Ethereum infrastructure by Consensys |
1. Alchemy
Alchemy is one of the best blockchain infrastructure companies because of the robust RPC access with great extra developer tools like extra analytics, mempool streams, and debugging dashboards available.
They service and support the Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base and Solana networks with tiered free and paid levels with prices scaling per compute unit and custom enterprise plans for higher volume.
Alchemy performs best with scalable dApps and NFT marketplaces while teams require deep observability and production support with approx. 99.9 % uptime.
They are super high performance with extra APIs and WebSocket support. They are often compared with NowNodes for the multi-chain breadth and uptime guarantees.
Alchemy- Key Features
- High-performing blockchain API & RPC Endpoints.
- Developer tools include dashboards, analytics, & mempool streaming.
- Enhanced WebSocket Integration.
- Debugging and monitoring tools.
- Support for Ethereum, layer 2 solutions like Arbitrum and Optimism, Polygon, and Solana.
- Other features include smart retries, error handling, auto-scaling infrastructure.
- Rich documentation and various SDKs are available.
Alchemy – Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| High performance RPC endpoints with enhanced features | Can be expensive at high usage tiers |
| Rich developer tools (analytics, dashboards, alerts) | No dedicated mobile app |
| Excellent documentation and community support | Free tier limits may be restrictive for large teams |
| Supports multiple networks including Ethereum, L2s & Solana | Higher learning curve for advanced tools |
| Strong reliability & uptime | Some features locked behind paid plans |
2. Blast
Blast specializes with high-throughput, low-cost RPC infrastructure, and multi-chain support with great effects on Ethereum and the Layer 2 networks around it. They are often compared to other big players like Alchemy and QuickNode for their pricing, which is highly competitive and calculated on the number of API calls or credits used.
They help to provide great, scalable, and fast endpoints for Web3 apps, and are useful for clients looking for reliable, affordable production infrastructure. Distributed infrastructure offers great uptime, and reliability is pretty good. Dashboards and web API keys are how users access their tools.
Blast – Key Features
- Optimized RPC endpoints are cost efficient.
- High through for API calls.
- Fast & reliable access to blockchains, especially EVMs.
- Scalable infrastructure to meet the needs of demanding applications.
- Easy setup of API key.
- Pricing is competitive.
- Efficient caching to reduce request pressure.
- Focus on cost efficient perfromance.
Blast – Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Cost-effective RPC infrastructure | Smaller ecosystem than top competitors |
| Fast endpoints optimized for throughput | No mobile app |
| Competitive pricing for startups | Fewer integrated developer tools |
| Easy API key setup | Not as feature-rich as Alchemy/QuickNode |
| Solid latency and uptime | Limited additional analytics |
3. Dexter Lab
Dexter Lab sees itself as a provider of Solana-derived infrastructure and offers real-time and historical data flows, archival RPC, and raw blocks to support data-hungry apps.
Pricing tends to scale to per request volume and archival access, which can be higher than simple RPCs but is appropriate to the enterprise theses and analytics within the Solana ecosystem.
Main supported blockchains are Solana and SVM rollups. Their performance is hyperefficient, real-time, and historical access to datasets is available, and is suitable for on-chain analytics, trading, and indexing.
Their unique mobile application is a standalone trading application. As an alternative, NowNodes has a more extensive, multi-chain RPC Solana plus EVM networks.
Dexter Lab – Key Features
- Enhanced Solana-centric Advanced RPC Services.
- Real-time block and transaction data.
- Streaming of historical data.
- Indexing support for further analytics.
- Access to the raw block data for deep applications.
- High speed data delivery.
- Optimized for Solana ecosystem.
- Enterprise grade infrastructure.
Dexter Lab – Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Powerful Solana-focused RPC infrastructure | Limited to Solana ecosystem mainly |
| Real-time and historical data access | Can be pricey for large data loads |
| Ideal for analytics and deep data apps | No mobile app |
| Enterprise-grade performance | Smaller support community |
| Advanced indexing capabilities | Fewer multi-chain options |
4. Syndica
Syndica provides RPC infrastructure alongside indexing specialized APIs and ChainStream services** to assist developers in accessing clean, indexed data and RPCs. Pricing and plans are volume and advanced APIs, and are designed for teams that are building analytics for data-rich applications.
Supported chains include the main EVM networks, but it’s always worth checking the provider to confirm the current supported chains list.
Their strength is in data indexing, and complex query APIs are available that provides the ability to go beyond what RPC offers for basic data retrieval. Their reliability is guaranteed, which is a definite plus for production workloads.
No personalized Customer mobile app exists. For extended costly multi-chain RPC node connections, NowNodes continues to be a viable alternative. | Enterprise-Grade Web3 APIs
Syndica – Key Features
- RPC Endpoints and data indexing APIs.
- Structured query access through ChainStream.
- Fast indexed responses for complex queries.
- Support for popular EVM chains.
- Stable RPC infrastructure.
- Developer friendly documentation.
- Advanced data filtering and query systems.
- Adaptable use regulations
Syndica – Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| RPC + data indexing APIs in one platform | Focus is narrower than general RPC services |
| Structured ChainStream query support | No dedicated mobile app |
| Enhanced data filtering | Less known than big players |
| Developer-friendly pricing | Smaller network support range |
| Good performance for complex apps | Not ideal for very high throughput apps |
5. Ankr
Ankr is a decentralized RPC network that operates on 30+ blockchains, namely Ethereum, Polygon, Avalanche, BSC, and others providing a fully supported no cost public node and a premium managed onpay private node ig from one selected blockchain.
Pricing provides a free construct with base traffic and premium pay as you go. This is best suited for applicants who want to prioritize from a decentralised construction.
Of course, global node spread and API hosted distributed architecture are important to performance and reliability, but with regards to latency differing from region to region.
A dedicated mobile app is non existent, although Web dashboards do fully support API Management. NowNodes is compared frequently for functionality and broader support of networks, especially for high-uptime SLAs.
Ankr – Key Features
- Decentralized RPC network
- Support for over 30 blockchains (EVM and non-EVM)
- Offers free and premium private public nodes
- Load-balanced distributed infrastructure
- Access to APIs with an easy to use key
- Integration with blockchains
- Network built with redundancy
Ankr – Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Decentralized RPC network for multi-chain | Performance can vary by region |
| Free public nodes available | Some endpoints may be slower than premium |
| Supports 30+ blockchains | Advanced features less polished |
| Redundant distributed nodes | No mobile app |
| Simple API access & dashboard | Support response can be slower |
6. QuickNode
QuickNode is recognized for low-latency global RPC endpoints for over 70 blockchains, including Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Avalanche, and others. Pricing splits between a free tier and paid tier.
The paid tier has sub tiers based on API region and quantity Ads, as well as around traffic to support scaling dApps. Helpers are dashboards, metrics, ded- nodes, and a hyper reliable network that has global edge nodes to sustain active, dApp reliance.
No mobile app exists, with developers preferred management to be through a UI.Multi-chain support with competitive uptime and flexible pricing is one of the features of NowNodes.
QuickNode – Key Features
- Endpoints with global network and low latency
- Supports over 70 blockchains
- Products: Data storage & retrieval tracing APIs and NFT management
- Flexible tiered subscriptions
- Choice of dedicated or shared nodes
- Dashboards for analytical insight and usage of data
- Scalable infrastructure for automatic adjustments
QuickNode – Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Low-latency global infrastructure | Paid plans can become costly |
| Supports 70+ blockchains | No dedicated mobile app |
| Tiered plans with analytics | Setup complexity for advanced features |
| Add-ons for tracing and archive data | Pricing model can confuse beginners |
| Strong uptime & performance | Higher tiers needed for enterprise SLAs |
7. GenesysGO
GenesysGO offers Solana RPC and validator infrastructure with configurable RPC endpoints, on-chain storage support, and tools that enhance performance and reliability by separating themselves from congested public RPC servers.
Furthermore, pricing enters at a linear fashion relative to the RPC use and the demand for custom endpoints.
GenesysGO is best for developers that build Solana dApps or validator services, and with the mobile app not dedicated for Solana, you can use the API to access the account dashboard.
Should clients need services across multiple chains, NowNodes is a great option with more than 110 networks and great uptime.
GenesysGo – Key Features
- infrastructure for validators and Solana RPC
- High-availability for dedicated systems
- High performance & faster public nodes available now
- Standard for RPC optimization and Solana Workloads
- High traffic application support
- Industry-grade tools for Solana
- Endpoints with modifiable parameters
GenesysGO – Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Solana-optimized RPC infrastructure | Only for Solana developers |
| Higher reliability vs public RPCs | No mobile app |
| Great for high-traffic Solana apps | Limited to one ecosystem |
| Enterprise-grade features | Smaller community support |
| Configurable RPC endpoints | Pricing can vary significantly |
8. OMNIA
OMNIA Offers secure and scalable RPC infrastructure with intelligent routing and privacy protection for Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Polygon RPC endpoints. Intelligent features for the RPC layer include high availability and added security policies, a great fit for DeFi apps and secure wallet interoperation.
Flexible public and private plans with varying secure features to fit your use case. Performance is primarily uptime, consisting of unprotected RPC access for lower tiers, but there is no dedicated mobile app.
NowNodes is often suggested when extensive access to multiple blockchains is needed with recommended SLA guarantees critical to production workloads.
OMNIA – Key Features
- Reliable RPC layers for security and high performance
- Routing protocols with intelligent privacy
- Ethereum & major Layer 2s compatible
- Dependable support for wallets and DeFi systems
- RPC requests handled efficiently
- Endpoints are customizable
OMNIA – Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Secure & censorship-resistant RPC routing | No mobile app |
| Strong uptime & custom configurations | Smaller ecosystem than big players |
| Reliable for wallet & DeFi apps | Limited multi-chain coverage |
| Performance-oriented SLAs | Fewer developer tools |
| Intelligent request optimization | Relatively newer service |
9. BetaRPC
BetaRPC is a barebones provider of RPC endpoints that is best suited for small dApps, wallets, and testing with basic access to Ethereum-compatible RPC.
Pricing is generally undercutting premium competitors. Supported blockchains are generally core EVM networks, although specifics depend on certain target altchains that each provider focuses upon.
Good for developers that require basic RPC without any sort of advanced optionality. While performance and reliability are straightforward, they have nothing on larger providers catered to quality enterprise solutions.
There’s no mobile app, and RPC is accessed via API keys. For larger multi-chain or production needs, NowNodes scales better with uptime and extensive API features.
BetaRPC Features
- Light RPC endpoints
- Minimal configuration requirements
- Affordable & sometimes free
- Reliable but rudimentary
- Support for core EVMs
- Perfect for early-stage products & small apps
BetaRPC – Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Simple lightweight RPC access | Very basic feature set |
| Free or very low pricing | Not ideal for enterprise apps |
| Easy setup | No mobile app |
| Good for testnets & early builds | Limited network support |
| Quick provisioning | No advanced tools |
10. Infura
One of the first blockchain infrastructure providers, and by far the most popular in the industry. While prices depend on the tier, generally, there are multiple free options, in addition to pay-as-you-go developer and enterprise plans based on credits, or requests.
It’s ideal for projects focusing solely on Ethereum and those that are part of the ConsenSys ecosystem (MetaMask for example). Infura is known for their reliability and uptime, although they also support websocket and archived data access.
There is no mobile app, although API and dashboards are available for access. A far more cost-effective alternative is NowNodes, which offers better multi-chain support and also has a very high SLA for availability.
Infura Features
- Most reliable RPC in the industry
- Detailed specs for Ethereum, IPFS, L2s, other EVMs
- Supports WebSocket and archive data
- Sustained, reliable scaling for robust uptime
- Excellent API documentation and developer tools
- Enterprise CLI, custom SLAs
Infura – Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Trusted & battle-tested RPC provider | Pricing can scale steeply |
| Supports Ethereum, L2s, IPFS | No dedicated mobile app |
| Strong uptime & reliability | Less flexible rate limiting |
| WebSocket & archive support | UI less modern than competitors |
| Large developer ecosystem | Advanced analytics are paid |
How to Choose the Best NowNodes Pay Alternatives?
While figuring out the best alternatives to Nownodes Pay, keep in mind some important aspects of the performance, reliability, and success of your project in the long run. Follow the guidelines below.
Vailability and Uptime.
Seek out companies that provide higher uptime guarantees (at least 99.9%+ SLA) with redundant infrastructure. This is because if the RPC endpoint is down, your app will be unable to retrieve data or broadcast transactions and this will disrupt your app’s user experience.
Speed and Latency.
Fast response times are always preferable due to the real time natures of dApps, DeFi, or **games. ** Providers that have geographically dispersed nodes are able to lower latency for global users.
Security and Access Control.
Verify that the provisioner supports API key protection, rate limiting, secure connections, and abuse mitigation that help safeguard your endpoints and your data. ([NOWNodes][1])
Scalability and Traffic Capacity
Your needs are bound to change as time goes on. It is advisable to pick services that **manage considerable amounts of traffic.
Chain and Feature Support
Ensure that the provider supports all the blockchains and RPC methods that your project is dependent on, and optional features that may be useful such as WebSocket streams or access to archived data.
Developer Tools and Documentation
Consider service providers that have clear documentation, SDKs, analytics, and debugging tools to help with integration and to lower productivity mistakes.
Support & Community
Responsive customer service and engaged moderators in the community are critical when you have issues during scaling or launch periods.
Price & Plans
Evaluating prices, free tiers for testing, and predictably scaling costs with clear limits are valuable when you need to budget for production workloads.
Prioritizing reliability, performance, security, and support makes it easier to choose RPCs that keep in-line with the demands and direction of your project.
Conclusion
When selecting a paid alternative to NowNodes for reliable blockchain access, the best option depends on the scale of your project, the chains you need, and the performance requirements. For big projects, Alchemy and QuickNode offer global low-latency RPC and rich developer toolings.
For price-sensitive teams, there is a good trade performance and price with Blast. Solid optimized RPC and data access for Solana projects is GenesysGO or Dexter Lab. For multi-chain decentralization with a good coverage and redundancy, there is Ankr.
For paid reliable alternatives see Infura for Ethereum ecosystems and OMNIA for secure and high-availability RPC. They all have good uptime and would be reliable alternatives to NowNodes for various use cases in Web3.
FAQ
What are good paid alternatives to NowNodes?
Some of the best paid alternatives to NowNodes include Alchemy, QuickNode, Infura, Ankr, Blast, GenesysGO, OMNIA, Dexter Lab, Syndica, and BetaRPC. These providers offer RPC endpoints, analytics tools, and SLAs for production workloads, each catering to different use cases like multi-chain access, Solana optimization, enterprise support, or cost-performance balance.
Why consider paid alternatives instead of NowNodes’s free tier?
Paid plans generally provide higher request limits, dedicated endpoints, guaranteed uptime SLAs (e.g., 99.9%+), faster support, archive data access, and enhanced analytics — essential for production dApps, exchanges, or high-traffic wallets. Free tiers are great for testing/MVPs, but paid plans prevent throttling and improve reliability.
Which provider is best for Ethereum-centric apps?
What’s the best alternative if I want global performance and multi-chain support?
Which provider is ideal for Solana projects?
If you’re building on Solana, GenesysGO, Dexter Lab, and QuickNode are strong alternatives. GenesysGO and Dexter Lab are tailored to Solana’s high-speed data needs, offering optimized RPC access and historical data support. QuickNode also provides reliable Solana RPC with global routing and uptime SLAs.
