10 Best Brokerage-as-a-Service Solutions for Web3 Companies in 2026

I’ll go over the Top Brokerage-as-a-Service Options for Web3 Businesses in this post. Platforms require safe, scalable, and effective brokerage services as the Web3 ecosystem expands.

Web3 enterprises can offer trading, custody, and investing capabilities with ease thanks to these solutions’ strong liquidity, compliance-ready infrastructure, and APIs. Here, we examine the leading companies that assist companies in streamlining their brokerage activities.

Key Point & Best Brokerage-as-a-Service Solutions for Web3 Companies

Platform	Key Features / Highlights
Alpaca	Commission-free trading API, easy integration for developers, real-time market data access.
SFOX	Smart order routing, multi-exchange liquidity, institutional-grade crypto trading.
B2Broker	White-label liquidity solutions, multi-asset brokerage, deep liquidity across markets.
DriveWealth	API-driven U.S. stock trading, fractional shares support, scalable for fintech apps.
Clear Street	Clearing and settlement services, secure infrastructure, low-latency execution.
Tradier	Brokerage API for stocks and options, trading tools integration, cost-efficient platform.
Interactive Brokers API	Global market access, advanced order types, comprehensive trading and risk management.
PrimeXBT Institutional	Crypto and traditional assets trading, leverage options, institutional-grade API.
Kraken Institutional APIs	Secure crypto trading, advanced order types, deep liquidity for institutional clients.
OKX Institutional	Crypto derivatives and spot trading, API access, high liquidity and global coverage.

1. Alpaca

One of the best Brokerage-as-a-Service solutions for Web3 companies is Alpaca, an API-first brokerage. It is a commission-free stock broker which allows for integration, and offers its clients and developers a seamless user experience. Developers and Web3 platforms can create fully functional real-time automated trading systems and investment applications.

They can now have several investment options due to features like fractional shares, and snowed to no costs due to the paper trading option. They can now cost-effectively and efficiently offer the brokerage integration as Alpaca can be easily incorporated as Menzi operates in the cloud.

Pros & Cons Alpaca

Pros:

• Trading without a commission and iterative trading is offered for Web3.
• Friendly for developers APIs with market tracking in real time.
• Infrastructure in the cloud enables quick integration and expansion.

Cons:

• Mostly centered around US markets, restricting international expansion.
• Competing corporations in the crypto space have a more extensive offering of crypto assets.
• Less advanced trading functions for the active trading entrepreneurs.

2. SFOX

Web3 companies can access institutional-grade crypto trading and multi-exchange smart order routing, which separates SFOX from other platforms. Additionally, SFOX can guarantee the best order pricing as it liquidizes several crypto exchanges.

The automated trading feature, along with SFOX’s API integration for seamless trading, allows Web3 users to access crypto trading easily.

SFOX can be trusted as they focus on transparent, secure, and fast trading, making it an ideal choice for Web3 projects. They possess the crypto trading services to decentralized Web3 platforms and Fintech applications, and maintain regulatory compliance, to provide crypto trading services.

Pros & Cons SFOX

Pros:

• Obtains the best execution by consolidating liquidity across various crypto exchanges.
• Trading system for institutions with sophisticated order routing.
• Provides secure custody and maintains compliance with regulations.

Cons:

• Compared to some retail focused crypto solutions, the fees are higher.
• Supports limited traditional assets, primarily focuses on crypto.
• Integration is difficult for smaller Web3 startups.

3. B2Broker

B2Broker stands out as one of the top white-labeling options providing liquidity and multi-asset brokerage services that enable clients to access and manage trading across forex, crypto, and traditional assets.

B2Broker is able to service Web3 companies and offers them high liquidity and the ability to manage multiple assets, providing customers with various trading options. B2Broker can be fully integrated with existing platforms, making it highly suitable for both incubating as well as well-established fintech companies, thanks to risk management, reporting, and adaptable infrastructure features.

B2Broker offers clients seamless and secure trading options alongside a solid foundation for Web3 companies to devise innovative trading alternatives, thanks to its global reach and unique position that offers regulatory assistance.

Pros & Cons B2Broker

Pros:

• Provides an extensive range of assets (crypto, forex, and stocks) for white labeling.
• APIs are scalable in the Web3 space.
• Provides services for risk and reporting management.

Cons:

• Can be a lot for new startups.
• There is a need to understand for API integration.
• Onboarding smaller companies and support could take time.

4. DriveWealth

DriveWealth is one of the top white-labeling options for U.S. stock trading that offers a developer-friendly API and services Web3 companies as a top Broker-At-A-Service for the Web3 arena. DriveWealth offers Web3 platforms micro-investing and access to the broader market with Web3 platforms thanks to fractional share trading.

DriveWealth is a highly scalable logistical infrastructure and allows for the fintech company to be fully compliant with SEC regulations while integrating asyst trading services into their applications.

With access to real-time data and improved performance, onboarding for the Web3 System is more efficient and allows for competitive brokerage activities. DriveWealth is considered a top-tier candidate for platforms in the Web3 ecosystem that want to offer a more streamlined approach to stock trading thanks to their commitment to accessibility.—

 Pros & Cons DriveWealth

Pros:

• Trading US stocks with API and fractional shares is available.* Designed for fintech applications and Web3 ecosystems.
• Freedom from RegTech compliance challenges.

Cons:

• U.S. equity-centric; global market investment options are inadequate.
• No support for transactions involving cryptocurrency.
• Order types offered well below those of competitors in the institutional space.

5. Clear Street

Clear Street is among the top Brokerage-as-a-Service solutions for Web3 businesses with clearing and settlement infrastructure for institutions. It offers safe, low-latency executions, and efficient settlement services for trades in equities, ETFs, and other assets. Web3 firms have the option of using Clear Street’s APIs for trade and settlement custodial management, eliminating the need to develop complicated backend systems.

Their reputation for operational risk and compliance management fosters the ability to navigate the regulatory complexities of multi-jurisdictional deployment. Clear Street is especially useful for Web3 businesses wishing to offer brokerage services to retail and institutional clients, as they have a highly available infrastructure built for agile expansion, innovation, and a compliant operational framework.

Pros & Cons Clear Street

Pros:

• High-quality clearing and settlement services.
• Low latency and secure execution for trading applications.
• Strong compliance and risk mitigation capabilities.

Cons:

• Primarily designed for larger or institutional Web3 platforms.
• Insufficient public API documentation for smaller developers.
• More rigid for fractional or micro-investing platforms.

6. Tradier

Tradier provides APIs for stock and options trading, making them a multi-feature brokerage. This has earned them the reputation of one of the top Brokerage-as-a-Service offerings for Web3 Companies.

Web3 businesses have an opportunity to embed brokerage services at an attractive price point, with features such as order management, market data, and trading tools. Tradier’s infrastructure is built for scalability, enabling a quick launch for new market entrants and fintech companies with custom trading solutions.

Their APIs have been purpose built for easy installation into fintech marketplaces, Web3 apps, or mobile apps, facilitating a seamless brokerage experience. With strong execution and compliance support, Tradier assists Web3 Companies in trading services for their customers.

Pros & Cons Tradier

Pros:

• API access for equity and options trading.
• Reasonable price for Web3 trading integration.
• Facilitates order management and market data access.

Cons:

• No international market access.
• No focus on trading cryptocurrencies.
• Limited advanced institutional tools.

7. Interactive Brokers API

Interactive Brokers API is considered the best among its competitors, and the only provider in the web3 space, offering brokerage as a service with global order routing and advanced order management.

They offer a customizable trading experience bridging multiple asset classes such as equities, options, futures, and forex. Embedded within the Interactive Brokers infrastructure is low latency execution, optimal for both institutional and retail clients.

They control the full stack and offer risk management, customizable reporting, and compliance tools to help web3 firms stay within the law and operate in a secure manner across jurisdictions. Interactive Brokers API is highly customizable and scalable, making it a preferred option for web3 fintechs who want to offer global brokerage capabilities.

Pros & Cons Interactive Brokers API

Pros:

• Access to global markets and multiple asset classes.
• Advanced order types, risk management, and reporting.
• Highly scalable and dependable backend for Web3 platforms.

Cons:

• Complexity during integration due to startup nature.
• Smaller trading volumes may have to pay higher fees.
• Comprehensive technical proficiency is required for full utilization.

8. PrimeXBT Institutional

PrimeXBT institutional has amassed a strong reputation among competitors for providing as a service solutions within web3 with the ability to trade both crypto and traditional assets with high leverage.

The institutional grade API allows for the automation of trading, liquidity management, and trade risk in a web3 ecosystems, providing the user with derivative products and customizable order types.

PrimeXBT is a highly secure, high performance infrastructure and satisfies the demands of web3 projects in need of brokerage services. The focus on institutional grade solutions makes it a strong option in web3 for companies looking to offer advanced trading capabilities while prioritizing security, compliance, and scalability.

Pros & Cons PRIME~XBT Institutional

Pros:

• Leverage trading on traditional and crypto assets.
• Institutional API with advanced trading functionalities.
• High security and performance capabilities.

Cons:

• Derivative trading focus. Not intended for basic brokerage applications.
• Lack of understanding of leveraged trading is detrimental.
• Minimal support for fractional shares and retail-oriented trading.

9. Kraken Institutional APIs

Kraken Institutional APIs have been recognized as one of the biggest and best Brokerage-as-a-Service solutions for Web3 businesses for the provision of safe and effective cryptocurrency trading. They possess the unique quality of providing deep liquidity and advanced order types, as well as multilayered security, making them best suited for Web3 fintech. Web3 businesses can use the APIs of Kraken to offer their clients automated trading, custody, and portfolio management services.

They, domestic and internationally, offer their platform clients regulatory compliant, secure, and global services. Kraken’s dependable and scalable infrastructure assists both newly founded crypto brokerages and established enterprises to deliver crypto brokerages to their clients, enriching their crypto trading processes with quality user experiences, all while Kraken meets and exceeds crypto trading industry standards on safety and security.

Pros & Cons Kraken Institutional APIs

Pros:

• Advanced order types and deep liquidity for crypto.
• Growing Web3 platforms benefiting from solid regulatory compliance and security.
• Automated trading and portfolio management systems active.

Cons:

• Vastly centered on crypto with minimal traditional assets.
• For smaller trades, fees can become significant.
• Complexity of API can cause a learning curve for newcomers.

10. OKX Institutional

OKX Institutional is regarded as one of the best Brokerage-as-a-Service solutions for Web3 companies, providing APIs for crypto spot and derivatives trading. It has a platform that enables Web3 applications to access high liquidity, advanced global market coverage, and multiple trading functions. Web3 businesses can use the APIs of OKX to offer trading services to their clients, including automated trading, custody, and portfolio management.

OKX is trusted by fintech companies and institutional clients for effective security, transaction, and regulatory compliance. Its scalable infrastructure ensures rapid expansion of services for Web3 businesses, enabling them to deliver reliable, consistent, and professional brokerage services to clients across the globe.

Pros & Cons OKX Institutional

Pros:

• High liquidity available for both crypto spot and derivative trading.
• Sophisticated API with global market access.
• Web3 infrastructure with strong security and scalability.

Cons:

• Focus is primarily on crypto. Limited trading of traditional assets.
• A significant level of technical skill is necessary for effective integration.
• Fees vary based on trading volumes and products.

Conclusion

Selecting the best Brokerage-as-a-Service solution is essential for creating safe, scalable, and effective trading platforms in today’s quickly changing Web3 market. Web3 companies can provide seamless brokerage services thanks to the strong APIs, deep liquidity, and compliance-ready infrastructure provided by providers like Alpaca, SFOX, B2Broker, DriveWealth, Clear Street, Tradier, Interactive Brokers API, PrimeXBT Institutional, Kraken Institutional APIs, and OKX Institutional.

Web3 entrepreneurs and financial innovators can reduce development complexity and concentrate on user experience, automation, and global market access by utilizing these platforms. The future of professional, accessible, and integrated brokerage in the Web3 area is represented by these solutions.

FAQ