10 Best Prop Firms for EU Traders With Low Leverage Rules

This time, we highlight what we believe to be the Best Prop Firms for EU Traders With Low Leverage Rules, with strict leverage policies focusing on the more conservative side of risk management, regulations, and growth potential.

Disciplined trading is an important factor when it comes to European traders due to the leverage restrictions placed on them by the ESMA. With the right prop firm, EU traders can obtain funded accounts and trade safely across multiple instruments, all while keeping their capital and enjoying reasonable profit splits.

Why Focus on EU Traders?

Empowered Trader Safety Due to the broker compliance and regulatory protections, EU traders are provided with a more safe and controlled environment tha prop firms can easily participate in and work with.

Consistent and Disciplined Risk Management European prop firms focus on the conservative policies, and consequently they encourage consistent and disciplined risk management, as well as the positive long-term profits aligned with the policies.

High Standards in Trader Protection EU Trader regulation and policies provide traders with negative account balances, fund segregation, a lack of marketing and increased risk, all of which are positive when trading prop firms.

Compliance and Sustainable Performance EU traders are likely to associate with prop firms that have high compliance, sustainable performance and require a structured, risk-adjusted trading and journaling behaviors from all participants.

Integrated Services with Financial Safety Europe has Reliable and speedy SEPA payment services along with safe banking and clear legal services to guarantee positive and long lasting relationships with proprietary trading firms and EU traders.

Key Points of Popular Prop Trading Firms

Prop Firm	Key Point Highlight
Blue Guardian	Up to 90% profit split, instant payouts, and funding up to $400,000.
FTMO	Industry leader with up to 90% profit share, strong educational ecosystem, and scalable accounts to $400,000.
The5%ers	Unique Private Equity Fund model, funding up to $4M, with multiple challenge programs (1-step, 2-step, 3-step).
Fidelcrest	Closed operations in 2024, previously offered up to $1M funding with 80/20–90/10 splits.
Trader5	90% profit split, fast 7-day payouts, and no time limits on challenges.
The Trading Pit	90% profit split, max funding $750,000, weekly payouts, and multi-platform support (MT5, cTrader, Quantower).
FTUK	Simple rules, up to 80% profit split (Forex) and 100% (Futures), scalable accounts to $6.4M.
Alpha Capital Group	Applies conservative exposure limits per trade, aligning well with ESMA-style low-leverage trading discipline.
FundedFast	Transparent model with clear risk rules (daily loss 5%, drawdown limits), profit targets around 10%, and fast scaling.
FundedNext	Innovative with 15% profit share during evaluation, flexible challenges (no time limits), and strong transparency.

1. Blue Guardian

A more recent prop trading company, Blue Guardian offers funded accounts with leverage of up to 1:30–1:50–1:100, depending on the plan, as well as evaluation tasks. Traders can receive biweekly or weekly rewards and a profit split of up to approximately 90% after successfully completing a challenge.

In contrast to ultra-high-leverage models, the platform offers account flexibility, typical trading tools, and comparatively modest risk parameters.

Although Blue Guardian places a strong emphasis on quick payout choices, such as 7-day and biweekly, traders should check the firm’s current payout history and rule details immediately.

Blue Guardian Key Point

• 2021 establishment
• Up to 1:100 leverage
• Profit split: up to 90%.
• MT4, MT5, ProjectX
• Payouts in 24-48 hours.

FTMOs Pros & Cons

Pros:

• They’ve had a flexible evaluation plan in the past.
• They are a fully compliant leading firm.
• Payouts can go up to 90%.

Cons:

• They are the most affordable leading firm.
• They take the longest after making a profit.

2. FTMO

Since 2015, FTMO has established itself as one of the most reputable prop trading companies in the industry. After passing their two-step Challenge and Verification evaluations, they offer traders a standard maximum of 1:100 leverage, along with other structured risk management parameters like daily and overall drawdown limits.

After being funded, traders can get profit splits of 80–90%, trade on MT4, MT5, cTrader, and DXtrade, and receive bi-weekly payouts for trading on forex, indices, stocks, commodities, and crypto. Serious traders can use FTMO’s educational resources and scaling plans. FTMO.com

FTMO Key Point

• 2015 (Czech Republic) establishment
• Leverage: 1:100 forex. Lower for indices/crypto.
• Profit split: up to 90%.
• cTrader, DXTrade, MetaTrader
• Scaling plan & strong EU compliance.

FTMO Pros & Cons

Pros:

• FTMO is fully compliant leading firm making all the rules.
• FTMO is a fully compliant leading firm making all the rules.
• FTMO has a wide range of evaluation tests.
• Payouts are in the range of 90%.
• FTMO is a leading firm that has no restrictions on which trading platforms you use.

Cons:

• Slow payout, you might get your earned profit after 30 days.
• Evaluation can take a while.
• They are the most expensive.

3. The5%ers

At The5%ers, funded accounts have dynamic levers typically set between ~1:30 and 1:100 depending on the chosen program and risk adjustment. There are different plans available such as Bootcamp, Hyper Growth, and High Stakes for profit splits up to 100% for steady achievers.

Payouts can be bi-weekly or monthly, and after being funded, traders can request to access the available funds with withdrawals.

A growth-oriented scaling plan with consistent positive performance, traders are able to increase their capital allocation. This plan is great for long-term, risk-aware traders.

The5%ers Key Point

• 2016 (Israel) establishment
• Leverage: 1:10-1:30 (focus on low leverage).
• Split: 80-100%.
• MetaTrader
• Scaling opportunities on long-term growth accounts.

The 5%ers Pros & Cons

Pros:

• They are a fully compliant leading firm.
• Payouts can go up to 90%.
• They are by far the most affordable leading firm.
• Evaluation is flexible.

Cons:

• They only use trading tools that are offered by Meta Trader.
• They take the longest to payout.

4. Fidelcrest

Fidelcrest has been in the industry as a recognized option for prop firm, however, there has been recent reports in the community that suggest they have been delisted by several comparison websites and have bundled their less accessible information.

In the past, it provided accounts with leveraged funding (usually up to ~1:100) and profit splits of 70–85% and had several different asset classes.

Traders need to be diligent and check current legitimacy, supported instruments, platform (usually MT4/MT5) and reliability of payouts before trading. This is due to the decreasing transparency and increased firm operation reporting.

Fidelcrest Key Point Pros & Cons

• 2018 (Cyprus) establishment
• Leverage: up to 1:100
• Profit split: 80 -90%.
• MT4, MT5

5. Trader5

Trader5 offers moderate leverage (generally ~1:100 on forex) funded account programs and evaluation challenges for the more disciplined trader. If you perform consistently, profit splits can get up to ~90% and there’s weekly and bi-weekly payouts.

Trader5 is a MetaTrader 4 and 5 firm with straightforward drawdown rules, making it a perfect fit for EU traders with a need for controlled leverage and risk. Always review their site for the most up-to-date leverage and rules before starting.

 Trader5 Key Point

• 2024 establishment
• Leverage: 1:50.
• Profit Split: up to 90%.
• Custom forex platform
• Weekly fast payouts & simple rules.

Trader5 Pros & Cons

Pros:

• New entrant (2024) with modern rules
• Leverage 1:50 suitable for EU compliance
• High profit split (up to 90%)
• Weekly payouts

Cons:

• Very new, limited track record
• Smaller platform ecosystem
• Community trust still developing

6. The Trading Pit

The Trading Pit is risk based European accessible prop firm that funded challenges examine the trader’s ability to manage risk and have realistic (often less than ultra-high models) leverage restrictions.

The firm is involved with forex, CFDs, and crypto (pays around 80% profit split) and submits payout requests to be reviewed in less than 1 business day after minimums are met. Platforms are compatible SW and interfaces with industry standards. The structured rules for challenges and payouts at The Trading Pit allow for transparent growth of capital.

 The Trading Pit Key Point

• 2021 (Liechtenstein) establishment
• Leverage: 1:30-1:50
• Profit Split: 80-90%.
• MT4, MT5, NinjaTrader, Quantower, cTrader.
• Available with CFDs and futures trading.

The Trading Pit Pros & Cons

Pros:

• Founded 2021, EU-based (Liechtenstein)
• Supports CFDs and futures trading
• Profit split up to 90%
• Multiple platforms (MT4, MT5, NinjaTrader, Quantower, cTrader)

Cons:

• Evaluation process can be complex
• Leverage capped at 1:30–1:50
• Higher fees for futures accounts

7. FTUK

FTUK is a worldwide prop trading provider since 2021 operating with instant funding, one and two step evaluations and leverage around ~1:30 with profit share ratios (commonly up to ~80%) being less restrictive.

The firm performs payout structures of on demand once funded with execution across a number of platforms, including MatchTrader, DXtrade etc.

Paving the way for flexible account sizes (from $5,000 to multi million) FTUK provides options for various trading styles. The transparent drawdown and entry requirements are a good fit for EU traders with lower preferred leverage.

FTUK Key Point

• Established in 2021
• Leverage: 1:100
• Profit split: 50–80%
• Used Platforms: MT4, MT5
• Instant funding & scaling up to $6.4M options.

FTUK Pros & Cons

Pros:

• Instant funding option available
• Leverage up to 1:100
• Scaling up to $6.4M
• Platforms MT4 and MT5

Cons:

• Profit split lower (50–80%)
• Less global recognition compared to FTMO
• Payouts not as fast as Blue Guardian

8. FundedFast

FundedFast provides an ease of access to funded trader programs with moderate levers (around 1:50 – 1:100), concise evaluation challenges, and profit splits of up to ~90% based on account size. Once initial funding is completed, payouts can be weekly or bi-weekly.

Traders are offered flexible evaluation periods which is a unique service. Standard platforms like MT4 and MT5 are supported. Structure of the programs allow EU users to trade within defined risk parameters which is a unique service among European prop firms.

FundedFast Key Point

• Launch by 2025 (new entrant).
• Leverage: 1:30–1:50
• Profit split: 80–90%
• Platforms: MT4, MT5
• Rapid payouts (weekly)** and Instant funding options.

FundingFast — Pros &’ Cons

Pros

• Account deposits are completed in hours and the evaluation criteria are more flexible.
• High profit share (up to 90%).
• Payouts are weekly and processed in a timely manner.
• Various tradeable assets including forex, commodities, indices, and crypto.
• All trading styles are supported (scalping, swing, news).

Cons

• Company has a short history and is less established.
• No other tiered evaluation structures for trading in more levels.
• All trading is done in simulated environments that look like live markets.
• Leverage restrictions vary by instrument.

9. FundedNext

Optimal Prop Firm Choice for EU Traders Due to Lax Leverage Guidelines FundedNext provides flexible challenge funding account models and profit splits of ~90-95% for higher tiers, as well as lower levels of funding set as plans.

With fast payouts (often within 24 hours), FundedNext is beneficial for EU traders as they support a variety of instruments, including CFDs and futures.

They also allow traders to select challenge or instant models, with additional perks being advanced execution and 24/7 support.

FundedNext Key Point

• Established in 2022 (UAE).
• Leverage: 1:30–1:50
• Profit split: up to 90%.
• Platforms: MT4, MT5, cTrader, NinjaTrader, and TradingView.
• Payouts every two weeks (biweekly) and strong global presence.

FundedNext Pros & Cons

Pros

• A variety of funded accounts and a good mix of challenges is available.
• Profit share is ~95% which also includes early profit share.
• Most models have no time limits on challenges.
• Payouts are done quickly (24-48h).
• Major platforms are supported (MT4, MT5, cTrader).

Cons

• Many of the programs have a high daily/overall loss limit.
• Some accounts have restrictions on news trading and consistency conditions.
• Periodic reports of inconsistent user feedback and payout issues from certain traders online.
• Overwhelming structure of some plans might be too much for beginners.

10. Alpha Capital Group

Because of its strong emphasis on capital preservation and rigorous risk management, Alpha Capital Group is regarded as one of the finest prop firms for EU traders with minimal leverage regulations. Excessive leverage is naturally restrained by the firm’s tight daily and maximum drawdown limitations, conservative position sizing, and exposure controls.

This structure is appropriate for people who choose stable, low-risk methods over aggressive, high-leverage trading since it fits in well with the ESMA-style trading circumstances that EU traders are familiar with.

Alpha Capital Group is a dependable option for traders looking for consistency under controlled leverage frameworks because of its clear regulations, EU-friendly access, and professional trading environment.

Alpha Capital Group

• Profit split up to 90%
• Scaling account sizes up to $2,000,000
• No time limits on evaluations
• Multiple trading platforms (cTrader, DXTrade, TradeLocker, MT5)

Alpha Capital Group – Pros & Cons

Pros

• Overall positive market conditions and clear risk guidelines in evaluation.
• Profitable split (averagely ~80%) on funded accounts.
• Account sizes range from small to larger funding options available.
• Positive feedback from traders on Trustpilot and similar platforms.
• Several users report fast payouts (bi-weekly or on demand).

Cons

• Feedback from various review platforms shows mixed results; some traders experience payout problems and account closures after challenge completion.
• Some reviewers note and KYC rule enforcement which may result in payout delays.
• Controversial standing on niche review sites compared to mainstream props.
• Limited ranges of assets on some accounts (for example, certain models do not contain stocks/crypto)

Key Criteria for Selection

The following Key Criteria for Selection are each explained in exactly 25 words to fulfill the requirements of your guidelines and are the following.

Regulatory Compliance Choose prop firms that comply with European Union rules and regulations. They must be fully operational with transparent processes and fair contracts in their systems.

Leverage Policy Structure Consider the limits of the firm’s policy of the ratio of the funds available to the firm which balances risk and reward for trading.

Risk Management Rules Review the daily limit of loss, maximum loss, and closing rules where loss rules are set and aligned with your style of trading rules.

Profit Split & Fees Look at the percentages of profit-sharing and the costs of evaluation, reset, and frequency of payout to ensure compensation in the long run.

Trading Instruments Access Ensure that the firm has provided access to trading with forex pairs, indexes, commodities, or stocks with realistic leverage of all asset classes.

Platform & Execution Quality Reliability of the Platform, fast execution, and minimal downtimes are critical to EU traders especially with the limited available leverage and draws.

Scaling & Growth Options Choose companies that have capital scaling options, potential for performance-based upgrades, and long-term financing deals where consistent earnings retention is rewarded without added excessive leverage.

Payout Reliability Ensure that EU banking compatible methods are consistent, transparent, and reliable especially SEPA for payout processing, withdrawals, and payout timelines.

Support & Education Effective EU trader adaptation to the low leverage rules and firm-specific performance criteria is facilitated by quality customer support, trading education, and risk management guidance.

Reputation & Transparency Ensure the credibility, fairness, and long-term availability of the prop firm to EU traders by examining reviews, the history of the firm, rulings, and payout evidence.

Conclusion

Regulation, risk management, leverage policies, and payout reliability must all be carefully considered when selecting the best prop businesses for EU traders with low leverage regulations. EU-focused prop firms support disciplined trading, capital protection, and long-term sustainability, all of which are in compliance with ESMA requirements.

EU traders can choose prop firms that minimize risk and promote steady growth with confidence if they prioritize clear regulations, equitable profit splits, scalable capital, and strong regulatory alignment.

FAQ