For enterprises building scalable blockchain applications, the right Web3 API provider can be a game changer. Although Moralis provides a full suite of tools for developers, some entities might need other options that include broader data coverage, more robust infrastructure, flexible pricing, or specific enterprise capabilities.
In this guide, we’ll cover the best Moralis alternatives for enterprise Web3 APIs, including platforms to power demanding workloads, multi-chain development, real-time data, and production-grade apps.
What Are Moralis Alternatives?
Moralis alternatives are blockchain infrastructure and Web3 API platforms that offer similar or complementary capabilities to access onchain data and build decentralized applications. These platforms provide RPC endpoints, blockchain indexing, wallet and token data, NFT APIs, DeFi data, real-time events, analytics, and developer tools.
When enterprise teams want more network coverage, different pricing, more scalability, specialized data services, better deployment flexibility or enterprise-grade support, they may look elsewhere. Businesses can choose providers such as Alchemy, QuickNode, Chainstack, GoldRush, Infura, The Graph, Bitquery, Kaleido, Helius or Allium depending on their requirements.
Key Points
| Moralis Alternative | Best For | Key Strength |
|---|---|---|
| Alchemy | Enterprise blockchain infrastructure | High-performance infrastructure and extensive developer tooling |
| QuickNode | Scalable blockchain infrastructure | Broad chain coverage and production-grade infrastructure |
| Chainstack | Multi-chain infrastructure | Flexible multi-cloud and multi-protocol deployment |
| GoldRush | Multichain decoded data APIs | Unified multichain data API designed for application developers |
| Infura | Ethereum and ConsenSys ecosystem | Established enterprise blockchain infrastructure |
| The Graph | Blockchain indexing | Flexible querying of application-specific indexed data |
| Bitquery | Advanced blockchain data analytics | Deep query flexibility for on-chain analytics |
| Kaleido | Enterprise blockchain applications | Enterprise-focused blockchain development and deployment |
| Helius | Solana-focused applications | Strong Solana data and developer infrastructure |
| Allium | Institutional blockchain data | Institutional-grade blockchain data infrastructure |
1. Alchemy (Alchemie)
Alchemy was founded in 2017 in San Francisco. It provides enterprise blockchain infrastructure via **Node APIs, RPC, WebSockets, Data APIs, NFT, Token, Prices, Transfers, Portfolio, Wallet and Webhook APIs. Alchemy supports 100+ blockchain networks such as Ethereum, Solana, Base, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, BNB Chain, Avalanche and more.
Pricing includes free tier (30M monthly Compute Units), Pay-As-You-Go starting at $0.525 per million CUs, and custom Enterprise plans. Integrations include SDKs, APIs and Webhooks Deployment is fully managed cloud infrastructure with dedicated enterprise options.
Alchemy Features
- Multi-chain RPC & Blockchain infrastructure
Token, NFT, Transfer, Price, and Portfolio Indexed Data APIs - Webhooks and WebSockets for live blockchain events
- Smart Wallets, Account Abstraction, Bundler & Gas Manager API’s
- AI development tools, MCP server, CLI, SDKs, and dev tooling
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Supports 100+ blockchain networks with broad API coverage. | Usage-based billing can become expensive for high-volume workloads. |
| Strong indexed Data APIs for tokens, NFTs, transfers, prices, and portfolios. | Some advanced features require paid plans. |
| Dedicated infrastructure is available for enterprise workloads. | Compute-unit billing requires teams to understand method-specific costs. |
| Strong developer tooling, SDKs, WebSockets, and Webhooks. | Best fit may be less compelling for highly specialized non-EVM workloads. |
| Smart wallets, gas sponsorship, and AI/MCP tooling expand its platform. | Enterprise features may require custom commercial arrangements. |
2. QuickNode
QuickNode was founded in 2017 and is based in Miami. It gives enterprise applications RPC APIs, WebSockets, Streams, Webhooks, gRPC, Dedicated Clusters, validators and blockchain infrastructure management. It has infrastructure that supports 80+ chains and 135+ networks like Ethereum, Solana, Bitcoin, Base and Hyperliquid. Pricing begins with a free trial offering 10M API credits.
Paid plans start at $34/month (billed annually). Business and Enterprise plans are also available. Integrations are S3 compatible storage, PostgreSQL, Kafka, Azure Blob, and IPFS. Deployment includes shared infrastructure or private , dedicated clusters for enterprise workloads in isolation .
QuickNode Features
- 80+ chains and 135+ networks with high-performance RPC infrastructure
- Streams and Webhooks for both real-time and historical Blockchain data
- Dedicated Clusters for isolated enterprise-grade infrastructure
*Other chain specific high performance data services e.g. Solana gRPC - IPFS, SQL Explorer, SDK, CLI, Admin API, MCP, and AI-agent tooling
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Broad multi-chain infrastructure covering major EVM and non-EVM ecosystems. | Advanced features and add-ons can increase overall costs. |
| Streams, Webhooks, gRPC, and dedicated infrastructure support production workloads. | Its large product catalog can create a steeper learning curve. |
| Dedicated clusters provide isolated infrastructure for enterprise applications. | Pricing depends on API-credit consumption and workload characteristics. |
| Marketplace offers additional blockchain-specific APIs and tools. | Some specialized features vary by supported network. |
| Strong option for high-throughput and multi-chain applications. | Teams may need several products rather than one unified data API. |
3. Chainstack
Chainstack, founded in 2018, is a Singapore-based Its platform is built on managed blockchain infrastructure offering RPC nodes, archive nodes, WebSockets, Solana Yellowstone gRPC, MEV protection, transaction acceleration, dedicated nodes and node-management APIs. Network coverage supports multiple major protocols and chains; enterprise deployments are offered in separate environments.
Pricing starts with a free Developer plan and goes up to Growth for $49/month, Pro at $199, Business at $499 and Enterprise from $990/month with custom options. Chainstack can be deployed through Chainstack Cloud, major cloud environments and self-hosted infrastructure, making it ideal for enterprises that need control over their infrastructure.
Chainstack Features
- Managed RPC infrastructure on 70+ blockchain networks
Global Nodes with geo-balanced, scalable RPC endpoints - Historical state and analytics archive nodes
- Customizable performance and infrastructure on dedicated nodes
- Self-hosted deployment with automatic updates, failover, monitoring and recovery
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Managed node infrastructure reduces blockchain DevOps overhead. | Pricing and infrastructure configuration can be more complex than simple API products. |
| Supports RPC, archive nodes, WebSockets, and dedicated infrastructure. | Data-enrichment capabilities may require additional services. |
| Offers flexible deployment options for different enterprise requirements. | Network-specific features can vary across supported chains. |
| Dedicated nodes provide more control over performance and capacity. | Less focused on application-level APIs such as NFT or portfolio data. |
| Suitable for teams requiring customizable blockchain infrastructure. | Enterprises may need technical expertise to optimize infrastructure choices. |
4. GoldRush
GoldRush is the developer-data platform previously connected to Covalent, with the GoldRush brand released in 2024. It offers wallet, transaction, token, NFT, price, DeFi, DEX, streaming and pipeline APIs, focusing on decoded and normalized blockchain data rather than raw RPC. GoldRush supports 100+ chains such as Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, Polygon, Solana, Hyperliquid and others.
Pricing includes a 14-day free trial with 25,000 credits Vibe Coding $10/month Professional $250/month Custom Inner Circle enterprise pricing. Integrations include SDKs, Google Cloud Marketplace, QuickNode Marketplace, and data pipelines.
GoldRush Features
- Unified Blockchain Data APIs on 100+ Chains
- Wallet APIs for balances, transactions, NFT & token info
- Core APIs for blockchain data structured and historical
- WebSockets for real-time blockchain event streaming APIs
SDKs, React components, decoded events, pricing data and multi-chain portfolio capabilities
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Provides decoded and structured blockchain data through unified APIs. | It is more data-focused than a traditional full RPC infrastructure provider. |
| Supports wallet, token, NFT, transaction, DeFi, and portfolio data. | Pricing is based on credits, requiring usage planning. |
| Multi-chain coverage simplifies applications spanning several networks. | Raw node-level infrastructure may require another provider. |
| Streaming APIs support real-time blockchain data workflows. | Advanced enterprise requirements may require contacting sales. |
| Useful for teams that want enriched data without building custom indexers. | Highly specialized blockchain workloads may need custom data solutions. |
5. Infura.
Infura is a blockchain infrastructure platform in the ConsenSys ecosystem. Infura is often used to access managed nodes and APIs. The enterprise offering is built around RPC infrastructure, blockchain APIs, archive data, WebSockets and expansion APIs like Gas API and supports 40+ networks. Currently, Infura has the following pricing tiers: Core (free), Developer ($50/month), Team ($225/month), and Enterprise (custom pricing).
Higher throughput and dedicated support for enterprise workloads. Most of the integrations are API based, linking apps, wallets and Web3 platforms through the standard blockchain interface. Deployment is managed cloud infrastructure that removes the operational burden of running blockchain nodes yourself.
Infura Features
- Real-time blockchain communication via WebSockets
- Managed blockchain RPC infrastructure for building applications
- Read and write blockchain data with Ethereum and multi-network API access
- Historical blockchain data and archive capabilities
- Enterprise infrastructure for scalable Web3 apps and developer integrations
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Established blockchain infrastructure with strong Ethereum ecosystem integration. | Network coverage is narrower than some multi-chain competitors. |
| Provides managed RPC, WebSockets, and blockchain API access. | Credit-based billing requires careful monitoring of API consumption. |
| Strong fit for Ethereum-focused applications and infrastructure. | Some advanced capabilities have plan-specific availability. |
| Closely connected to the Consensys and MetaMask ecosystem. | Less extensive first-party data tooling than platforms such as Alchemy. |
| Enterprise plans support larger workloads and business requirements. | Teams seeking broad non-EVM coverage may prefer alternatives. |
6 The Graph
The Graph is a decentralized indexing protocol for blockchains that enables the creation of Subgraphs—open APIs that can be queried using GraphQL to obtain blockchain activity. It supports 60+ networks , including Ethereum-compatible chains and some non-EVM networks . There is additional indexing infrastructure available via Firehose and Substreams .
Developers are able to build, deploy and publish custom Subgraphs using the Graph CLI and Subgraph Studio. Pricing begins with 100,000 free queries per month and pay-as-you-go pricing, with custom gateway solutions available for enterprise agreements.
The integrations are with GraphQL, API keys, Graph Explorer, Subgraphs, Firehose and Substreams. Decentralized indexing can be deployed through The Graph network.
The Graph Features
- Subgraph Studio to build and deploy indexed datasets
- Subgraphs and decentralized blockchain indexing
- GraphQL APIs for querying structured on-chain data
- Firehose and Substreams for high-performance blockchain data processing
- Multi-blockchain support and decentralized data infrastructure
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Purpose-built decentralized indexing infrastructure for blockchain data. | Requires understanding Subgraphs and indexing concepts. |
| GraphQL makes indexed blockchain data easy to query. | It is not a conventional full-service RPC provider. |
| Subgraphs allow developers to create application-specific datasets. | Building and maintaining custom Subgraphs can require development effort. |
| Firehose and Substreams support high-performance data processing. | Data availability depends on supported networks and indexing infrastructure. |
| Strong choice for structured onchain data and decentralized applications. | Less suitable when an application primarily needs raw RPC endpoints. |
7. Bitquery
Bitquery was started as Bloxy in 2017 and pivoted to Bitquery in 2018. It exposes rich blockchain data via GraphQL APIs, WebSocket subscriptions, gRPC, Kafka streams and cloud datasets, useful for DeFi, trading, analytics, compliance and blockchain intelligence. Bitquery supports 40+ blockchains like Ethereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Polygon, Arbitrum, Base, Tron, Cardano and more.
The cost is in resource-based Points and includes self-service plans and enterprise options. Integrations include **AWS S3, Snowflake, Google BigQuery, Azure, Databricks and Kafka. It is API and data-infrastructure driven deployment, including enterprise streaming and bulk data delivery.
Bitquery Features
- GraphQL APIs for blockchain structured data
- WebSocket subscriptions for onchain activity in real time
- Blockchain analytics for transactions, tokens, DEXs and DeFi
Streaming and Enterprise Data Pipeline Data Delivery - Analytics, trading, compliance, monitoring, and blockchain intelligence applications support
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| GraphQL provides flexible access to structured blockchain data. | Advanced querying can require blockchain-data expertise. |
| Strong coverage for transactions, tokens, DEXs, DeFi, and analytics. | Usage-based data access can become costly for large workloads. |
| WebSockets enable real-time blockchain monitoring. | It is more analytics/data focused than general-purpose RPC infrastructure. |
| Supports streaming and enterprise data-delivery workflows. | Teams may need additional infrastructure for application RPC needs. |
| Useful for trading, compliance, monitoring, and blockchain intelligence. | Query complexity can vary significantly between blockchain ecosystems. |
8. Kaleido
Kaleido was founded by enterprise technology leaders including Steve Cerveny, Sophia Lopez, Peter Broadhurst and Jim Zhang with offices in **Raleigh, North Carolina. Its platform is for enterprise blockchain and digital-asset projects via Chain Infrastructure, Web3 Middleware, standardized tokenization, and blockchain network services. Kaleido supports enterprise blockchain environments such as Ethereum based networks and consortium deployments.
Pricing includes a free Starter plan, Developer use at about $0.15 per node-hour, Business plans and custom Enterprise contracts. The integrations are defined by the selected blockchain and middleware services. Deployment can be handled through Kaleido Cloud or enterprise blockchain environments, with self-service and production options.
Kaleido Features
- Enterprise blockchain infrastructure and network management
- Blockchain-as-a-Service for business and consortium applications
- Digital asset and tokenization infrastructure
- Web3 middleware for connecting enterprise applications with blockchain networks
- Managed cloud-based blockchain environments designed for enterprise deployments
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Designed specifically for enterprise blockchain environments. | May be more infrastructure than smaller Web3 applications require. |
| Provides blockchain network, middleware, and digital-asset capabilities. | Pricing can be less transparent for customized enterprise deployments. |
| Supports business and consortium blockchain use cases. | Developer experience may differ from consumer-focused Web3 API providers. |
| Managed environments reduce operational blockchain infrastructure work. | Not primarily designed as a simple multi-chain data API. |
| Strong option for enterprise tokenization and blockchain projects. | Teams primarily needing high-volume public-chain RPC may prefer specialized providers. |
9. Helius
Helius was founded in 2022 by Mert Mumtaz, Nicolas Pennie and Liam Vovk and is based in Claymont, Delaware. Helius is very much focused on Solana but there are broad multi-chain providers with RPC nodes, better APIs, historical data, Webhooks, transaction infrastructure, Sender, LaserStream, gRPC, Shreds and preprocessed transaction data.
Pricing starts free with 1M credits, then Developer at $49/month, Business at $499, Professional at $999 and custom Enterprise plans. Enterprise capabilities such as SOC 2, custom limits, geographic coverage, optimized infrastructure, and SLAs. Deployment provides managed RPC infrastructure, dedicated nodes and low latency streaming infrastructure to trade and for high volume applications.
Helius Features
- Solana-focused RPC infrastructure and high-performance APIs
- Enhanced APIs for transactions, tokens, NFTs, and wallet activity
- Webhooks for real-time Solana event notifications
- gRPC, LaserStream, and low-latency blockchain data streaming
- Developer infrastructure for DeFi, trading, wallets, payments, and high-volume Solana applications
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Deep specialization in Solana infrastructure and developer tooling. | Its strongest capabilities are centered on the Solana ecosystem. |
| Provides enhanced APIs for transactions, tokens, wallets, and NFTs. | Not an ideal single provider for broad multi-chain requirements. |
| Webhooks, gRPC, and real-time streaming support low-latency applications. | Solana-specific tooling may not translate directly to EVM workflows. |
| Dedicated infrastructure supports high-volume Solana applications. | Pricing is based on credits and plan-specific limits. |
| Strong fit for Solana DeFi, trading, wallets, and payments. | Enterprises requiring many blockchain ecosystems may need another provider. |
10. Allium
Allium was started in late 2021 and has teams in New York, Singapore and remote locations. It is built for enterprise blockchain data and not basic RPC. It provides standardized auditable datasets across **150+ blockchains and 1,000+ protocols. It includes Ethereum, Solana, Base, Arbitrum and other networks, with data on stablecoins, DeFi, DEXs, RWA, staking, lending and payments.
20,000 free API credits and paid pricing starting at $200/month. Enterprise pricing is available for streaming, warehouse delivery and dedicated support. Integrations with Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3 Deployment is concentrated on API, streaming and enterprise data-warehouse delivery.
Allium Features
- Normalized blockchain data across a large number of networks
- APIs for querying structured on-chain datasets
- Blockchain data, real-time and historical, for enterprise analytics
- Enterprise data workflow data warehouse integration
- Specialized data on stablecoins, DeFi, DEXs, RWAs, staking and blockchain payments
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Focuses on standardized blockchain data for enterprise use cases. | More suitable for data infrastructure than basic RPC access. |
| Provides APIs and datasets for analytics, DeFi, stablecoins, and payments. | Enterprise-grade capabilities may require custom pricing. |
| Useful for organizations working with large historical datasets. | Data-focused workloads can require additional engineering knowledge. |
| Supports data-warehouse-oriented enterprise workflows. | Not the best choice for teams that only need simple node endpoints. |
| Strong fit for institutional analytics and blockchain intelligence. | Exact data coverage and features can vary by blockchain and dataset. |
Conclusion
Your ideal Moralis alternative depends on your blockchain coverage, API needs, scalability, pricing model, integrations, and deployment preferences. For general Web3 infrastructure, Alchemy and QuickNode are great choices, and Chainstack has flexible managed node solutions. GoldRush, Bitquery, The Graph, and Allium are the best for teams that need enriched blockchain data, indexing, analytics, or data pipelines. Infura is still a good choice if you already have an RPC infrastructure in place and Helius is especially good for Solana apps. Kaleido is a stand-out for enterprise blockchain environments. This comparison allows companies to find a provider that meets their technical needs, growth plans, and Web3 infrastructure strategy.
FAQ
What are the best Moralis alternatives for enterprise Web3 APIs?
Alchemy, QuickNode, Chainstack, GoldRush, Infura, The Graph, Bitquery, Kaleido, Helius, and Allium are notable alternatives, depending on API coverage, blockchain support, indexing, scalability, and enterprise requirements.
Which Moralis alternative is best for enterprise Web3 infrastructure?
Alchemy and QuickNode are strong options for broad blockchain infrastructure, RPC access, APIs, and scalable Web3 applications. The best choice depends on the required networks and workload.
Which Moralis alternative is best for blockchain data?
GoldRush, Bitquery, The Graph, and Allium are particularly useful when an enterprise needs enriched blockchain data, indexing, analytics, historical datasets, or data pipelines.
Which Moralis alternative is best for Solana?
Helius is a strong choice for Solana-focused applications because it provides Solana RPC, enhanced APIs, Webhooks, gRPC, transaction infrastructure, and real-time data services.
Are Moralis alternatives suitable for enterprise applications?
Yes. Several alternatives provide enterprise-oriented capabilities such as higher throughput, dedicated infrastructure, SLAs, security controls, technical support, data integrations, and scalable API access.
